dnsgerma.blogg.se

Sas vs sas jmp
Sas vs sas jmp





"Near-line" is a marketing term for "7.2K RPM drives not designed for 24/7/365 continual usage". How can a single disk in a hardware SATA RAID-10 array bring the entire array to a screeching halt? Their main characteristic is higher random read and write performance, but the details are beyond the scope of this question. Solid-state disks (SSDs) are a higher tier of storage and shouldn't be compared directly with rotating media.They have a slight price premium over the same sized SATA drives. They are available in higher capacities than enterprise SAS disks. Nearline or Midline SAS are usually mechanically-equivalent to 7,200 RPM SATA disks, but feature a SAS interface and offer the benefits of the SAS protocol.Enterprise SAS disks are your fastest and most resilient rotating media available at 10,000 and 15,000 RPM.Right now, the market conditions are such that you should try to use SAS disks everywhere you can. See the related links on the right pane of this question. I apologise about the rambling tone in this message, it's 5am and I haven't slept much. "Enterprise" SATA drives are compatible with my SAS RAID controller, but I'd like to know what advantage SAS drives have over SATA drives as they seem to have similar specs (but one is a lot cheaper).Īlso, how do SSDs fit into this? I remember when RAID controllers required HDDs to spin at the same rate (as if the controller card supplanted the controller in the drive) - so how does that work out now? Also my old SCSI controllers have their own battery backup and DDR buffer - neither of these things are present on the SAS controllers. But these SAS/SATA drives seem like the drives I have in my desktop, only more expensive. The Ultra-320 SCSI RAID controllers in my old servers were simple enough: One type of interface (SCA) with special drives with special controllers, humming at 10-15K RPM. My Dell servers all have SAS RAID controllers in them and they seem to be cross-compatible to an extent. I'm unsure about the differences in these storage interfaces.







Sas vs sas jmp